Retributivism: Punishment and Justification

No. Panggil :	eja-21-0734
Nama Orang :	Anant, R Deogaonkar.






Penerbitan :	[Place of publication not identified] : Proquest - Crime Justice and Cyber Criminology, 2021

Abstrak	The retributive principle is that offenders should be punished because and only because they have culpably done wrong. This is an instance of this more general principle of desert. We all have primary duties not to do the sort of acts that malum in se criminal statutes prohibit. We also have secondary duties to allow ourselves to be made to suffer if we have violated these primary duties. The trigger for these secondary duties is again our culpability in violating the primary duties that define wrongdoing. This article provides a brief overview of the key tenets of the most prevalent impure versions of retributivism: deontological, consequentialist, and mixed/hybrid. Each overview is followed by accounts, theories, and justiffcations. At the end the author concludes that no version of retributivism can serve as a complete theory of punishment.
Entri Tambahan Nama Orang
001 Hak Akses (open/membership)	membership
Kata Kunci	Retributivism, Deontological, Consequentialist, Mixed, Justification, Punishment.
ISSN	0973-5089
Tahun Terbit	2021
No. Induk	eja-21-0734
Entri Sumber Data	Proquest - Crime Justice and Cyber Criminology
Entri Utama Nama orang	Anant, R Deogaonkar.
Volume, Nomor, Tahun dan Hlm.	vol. 16, no. 1, p. 17-33
Entri Utama Nama Badan
Barcode	eja-21-0734
Subjek Topik
Judul Utama	Retributivism: Punishment and Justification
Kode Bahasa	eng
Sumber Koleksi	Perpustakaan Nasional