Faith-based arbitration evaluated: the policy arguments for and against religious arbitration in america

No. Panggil :	eja-21-0629
Nama Orang :	Broyde, Michael j.






Penerbitan :	[Place of publication not identified] : Cambridge - Crime, 2018

Info Lainnya

Abstrak	This article explores whether allowing such expansive arbitration is a wise idea for the United States (and other western democracies). Like all arbitration, religious arbitration starts with a contract to arbitrate, but frequently does not invoke the law of the United States as the law to be used to resolve disputes, but instead allows parties to resolve disputes according to their own religious principles, both procedurally and substantively. The article is organized into two substantive parts. One part explores the strengths and weaknesses of the seven arguments against faith-based arbitration, which are (1) one law for one people; (2) religious arbitration produces substantive injustice; (3) religious arbitration produces procedural injustice; (4) religious arbitration is often subtly coercive to its mem bers; (5) liberal society has a dificult time policing religious arbitration; (6) enforcement of religious arbitration sometimes violates people s rights to religious freedom; and (7) allowing religious arbitration promotes isolation and non-integration of religious communities. The next part explains and criticizes the five arguments in favor of religious arbitration, which are (1) religious arbitration is a religious freedom imperative; (2) religious arbitration can resolve some commercial disputes more accurately than secular courts can; (3) religious arbitration is the only way to resolve certain religious problems; (4) secular regulation of religious arbitration helps moderate and integrate religion; and (5) religious arbitration promotes value sharing between religious and secular cultures and as such enriches public discourse. The article concludes with an endorsement of the value of religious arbitration subject to reasonable procedural and substantive limitations.
Entri Tambahan Nama Orang
001 Hak Akses (open/membership)	membership
Kata Kunci	religious arbitration, contract law, alternative dispute resolution, religious freedom
ISSN
Tahun Terbit	2018
No. Induk	eja-21-0629
Entri Sumber Data	Cambridge - Crime
Entri Utama Nama orang	Broyde, Michael j.
Volume, Nomor, Tahun dan Hlm.	vol. 33, no. 3, p. 340-389
Entri Utama Nama Badan
Barcode	eja-21-0629
Subjek Topik
Judul Utama	Faith-based arbitration evaluated: the policy arguments for and against religious arbitration in america
Kode Bahasa	eng
Sumber Koleksi	Perpustakaan Nasional