Retributivism, Penal Censure, and Life Imprisonment without Parole

No. Panggil :	eja-21-0127
Nama Orang :	Dagan, Netanel Roberts, Julian V.






Penerbitan :	[Place of publication not identified] : Taylor and Francis - Criminology and Law, 2019

Info Lainnya

Entri Tambahan Nama Orang
Abstrak	This article advances a censure-based case against sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Our argument justifies a retributive second look assessment of long-term prison sentences. The article focuses on the censuring element of long-term prison sentences while reconceptualizing penal censure as a dynamic and responsive concept. By doing so, the article explores the significance of the prisoners life after sentencing (largely ignored by retributivists) and promotes a more nuanced approach to censure-based proportionality. Policy-makers may welcome this approach as a way to control excessive prison sentences while remaining within a retributive penal framework. Although we are making a general argument about the need for responsive censure within a retributive sentencing regime, the case for this approach is particularly compelling at the present time. Almost all Western nations, and particularly the US, impose very lengthy, often life sentences of imprisonment for a wide range of offences, thereby affecting large numbers of prisoners.
001 Hak Akses (open/membership)	membership
Kata Kunci	penal theory, retributivism, penal censure, life imprisonment without parole
ISSN	0731-129X (Print) 1937-5948 (Online)
Tahun Terbit	2019
No. Induk	eja-21-0127
Entri Sumber Data	Taylor and Francis - Criminology and Law
Entri Utama Nama orang	Dagan, Netanel; Roberts, Julian V.
Volume, Nomor, Tahun dan Hlm.	vol. 38, no. 1, p. 1-18
Subjek Topik
Barcode	eja-21-0127
Judul Utama	Retributivism, Penal Censure, and Life Imprisonment without Parole
Kode Bahasa	eng
Sumber Koleksi	Perpustakaan Nasional