Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts

No. Panggil :	eja-21-0126
Nama Orang :	Ryberg, Jesper






Penerbitan :	[Place of publication not identified] : Taylor and Francis - Criminology and Law, 2021

Entri Tambahan Nama Orang
Abstrak	A traditional assumption in retributivist thinking is the view that an offenders desert is determined exclusively on the basis of the gravity of the crime committed. However, this assumption has recently been challenged. Netanel Dagan and Julian Roberts have advocated a dynamic theory of desert, or what they refer to as the dynamic censure model. According to this model, certain post-sentencing reactions in the offender should be taken into account in the determination of the offenders desert and the severity of appropriate punishment. The purpose of this article is to assess this dynamic concept of desert. I argue that despite the fact that the model offers a new and interesting approach to desert and sentencing, it also faces a range of theoretical challenges that are not easily answered.
001 Hak Akses (open/membership)	membership
Kata Kunci	desert, dynamic censure theory, proportionality, retributivism, sentencing
ISSN
Tahun Terbit	2021
No. Induk	eja-21-0126
Entri Sumber Data	Taylor and Francis - Criminology and Law
Entri Utama Nama orang	Ryberg, Jesper
Volume, Nomor, Tahun dan Hlm.	vol. 40, no. 1, p. 56-67
Subjek Topik
Barcode	eja-21-0126
Judul Utama	Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts
Kode Bahasa	eng
Sumber Koleksi	Perpustakaan Nasional